Teah Chavez vs Haruna Arakawa Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 16 Oct at 05:25 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Chavez vs H. Arakawa

CAN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Chavez 1 - 0 Arakawa
They have played 3 sets in total, with Teah Chavez winning 2 and Haruna Arakawa winning 1. The last match between Teah Chavez and Haruna Arakawa was at the W35 Quebec City, 16-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Draw getting the victory 7-5 1-6 7-6(6).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Chavez | 1 |
| Arakawa | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W35 Quebec City(10-16-25)
T. Chavez vs H. Arakawa H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 55.56% (15-12) | Career Total W/L | 52.20% (249-228) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 4 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
T. Chavez vs H. Arakawa Match Preview:
- Who has a slight edge in second serve performance? Haruna Arakawa, winning 36.73% compared to Teah Chavez’s 35.46%.
- In terms of return games, Haruna Arakawa excels in second serve returns with 50.33%, significantly outperforming Teah Chavez's 40.00%.
- Does Teah Chavez have an advantage in first serve returns? Yes, slightly, with 40.19% over Haruna Arakawa's 37.65%.
- Considering pressure situations, Haruna Arakawa has saved 45.38% of breakpoints, slightly better than Teah Chavez’s 40.82%.
- Looking at overall win/loss records from the past year, Teah Chavez has a better win ratio at 66.67% compared to Haruna Arakawa's 55.56%.
- Haruna Arakawa shows the best performance on indoor hard courts, winning 71%, whereas Teah Chavez shows equal proficiency on hard courts with the same win percentage.
- Both players primarily compete in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K, with Teah Chavez having a higher win ratio in these events.
- The range of opposition faced shows a notable difference, as Haruna Arakawa's opponents have a lower average rank compared to those faced by Teah Chavez.
- In deciding sets, Haruna Arakawa is immensely successful, clinching 71% of them, while Teah Chavez has not secured any wins in similar situations over the past year.
Editorial Prediction (October 16, 2025, UTC):
As we assess the head-to-head statistics, Haruna Arakawa demonstrates a slight advantage in second serve performance and excels significantly in returning second serves. This could play a decisive role in the upcoming match against Teah Chavez.
While Teah Chavez shows a superior win percentage over the past year and performs slightly better on first serve returns, her lack of success in deciding sets and lower break point saving ability may affect her chances in long, pressure-filled matches.
Despite Teah Chavez having faced higher-ranked opponents, the success rate in crucial match-deciding sets heavily tilts in favor of Haruna Arakawa.
Considering these factors, Haruna Arakawa is more likely to win this upcoming tennis match due to her dependable performance in critical areas of the game.
Teah Chavez vs Haruna Arakawa Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Chavez vs H. Arakawa H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 17 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:59:0 | Average Match Time | 2:59:0 |
| 66% (80/122) | 1st Serve % | 78% (87/111) |
| 56% (45/80) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (45/87) |
| 38% (16/42) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (10/24) |
| 41% (7/17) | Break Pts Won % | 45% (9/20) |
| 50% (56/111) | Return Points Win % | 50% (61/122) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Chavez Recent Matches Played
H. Arakawa Recent Matches Played

T. Chavez vs H. Arakawa Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.56% (15/12) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.20% (249/228) |
| 56.25% (36/28) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.45% (550/519) |
| 52.32% (316/288) | Games Win/Loss | 50.82% (4861/4704) |
| 64.29% (9/5) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.68% (177/159) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 44.23% (23/29) |
| 46.15% (6/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56.32% (49/38) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 37 | Aces Total | 157 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 86 | Total Double Faults | 942 |
| 1:44:20 | Average Match Time | 1:33:57 |
| 349.33 | Average Opponent Rank | 534.57 |
| 64% (1247/1948) | 1st Serve % | 69% (18688/27133) |
| 58% (728/1247) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (10478/18688) |
| 45% (318/701) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (3769/8447) |
| 46% (119/256) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1838/3713) |
| 47% (918/1935) | Return Points Win % | 48% (13074/27210) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 55.56% (15/12) | Challenger W/L | 47.74% (169/185) |
| 0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 65.57% (80/42) |
| 56% (15/27) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (244/465) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 20% (1/5) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (43/81) |
| 40% (4/10) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (67/123) |
| 80% (15/12) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (248/212) |
| 20% (15/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (248/35) |
| 25% (12/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (229/33) |